Skip to main content

More on Rev. Al and Journalistic Integrity

Rev. Al Sharpton
Rev. Al Sharpton (Photo credit: Talk Radio News Service)
If you happen to follow my Twitter feed or watch the news much, you will note an impassioned plea by Rev. Al and the Martin family for peace on the 20th anniversary of the L.A. race riots.  In my opinion, there wouldn't be such an urgent need to plea for peace if this case hadn't been inflated into some big race issue by Rev. Sharpton and other [possibly] publicity-seeking folks.  Whether he intended it to be this way or not, it has evolved into an ugly situation.  I am extremely disappointed in the way this was "racially profiled" by the mainstream media and labelled by some as a hate crime before Zimmerman has even had a chance for a fair trial (which will be tougher than ever now).  I hope that we, as a country, can learn some valuable lessons from this, as to prevent this unnecessary heightened level of emotion and subsequently racially-charged atmosphere that now surrounds this case from happening again.

I want to believe that Rev. Sharpton's intentions are legitimate and he really wants to see justice done and nothing more, but have to wonder when he makes such outcries for justice -when he really doesn't know for sure what that justice should mean.  What if justice means that Zimmerman is found not guilty?  I am not saying that he is not guilty and I suspect that his actions led, at least in part, to the death of Trayvon -- simple because he failed to heed the 911 person's request not to pursue him.  Now that the case has more than garnered a huge amount of national attention, acts of violence are being committed and the name Trayvon has been invoked in some of these cases as innocent victims are severely beaten.  Yet, in all of this, I don't hear Rev. Al making headlines screaming for justice in those cases.

Rev. Sharpton is considered to be an honorable, caring man by many whose opinions I respect, such as Rev. Jackson's daughter Santita.  Recently hired by fox News as a contributor, I saw her on the O'Reilly factor one evening defending Rev. Sharpton's integrity.  I really like and respect this lady and will give her opinion some merit in considering everything been said and written around Sharpton and the Martin case.  But still, I have to wonder.

I have seen no evidence (other than shamefully-tampered recordings) to indicate that this was a racially-motivated killing.  I won't say that it was or was not -- because I do not have access to all the facts in this case; nor do any of the news networks that seem to feel they have the right to be judge and jury in this matter know for certain what happened.  I no longer watch MSNBC because, in my opinion, their journalistic integrity has been rightfully called into question and I find some of the comments made by some of their hosts despicable.

I'll wrap this post up by writing this:  I believe that these cases of violence toward white people that are sporadically happening in Trayvon's name around the country are nothing more than cowardly outpourings of hatred and frustration that have nothing to do with "justice for Trayvon" -or justice for anybody, for that matter.  They would have occurred anyway; Trayvon's killing created a convenient excuse and way for some people to try to reconcile their conscience around deplorable acts.

Your thoughts?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Treason or Patriotism?

Many years ago, the Democrats couldn't wait to get all of the facts surrounding Watergate out in the public eye. The Washington Post has been celebrated as a bastion of the free press recently in a movie (which we have yet to see, but plan to).


Now, the idea of releasing a memo that may indicate wrong-doing on the part of the FBI and DOJ is hailed as treasonous by some who would prefer the secrets remain secrets. I have seen or heard of nothing in the recently released memo that would appear to compromise national security -- have you?

Hate Speech

The amount of vitriol directed at President Trump seems to be unprecedented. At least, that is what those on the right seem to think. Of course, I remember plenty of criticism and hate speech hurled at President Obama during his time in office, as well. I don't think I really need to mention President George W. Bush, do I?

There has never been (in my lifetime) such a level of animosity between opposing viewpoints as I see in today's America. Democrats hurl murderous accusations against the Republicans for their healthcare proposals and those of a conservative view sling accusations of incompetence and hypocrisy back at them. Of course, either side is generally pretty good at documenting their accusations with freshly spun 'facts.'

No matter where you fit into the political spectrum, it is important to note that such contention is counter-productive. Whenever people react at the behest of their emotions, clear-headed and rational decisions are nowhere to be found. Moreo…

Comey Testimony

It's been a while since I have seen the kind of hype that there has been around having Director Comey testify in front of the Senate today. It seems worse than Watergate! There also seems to be no evidence thus far except for of the here-say variety .

No less than 5 times did he call President Trump (or his administration) a liar. Aside from what that does to the office of the President, it takes away from getting things done that so desperately need to get done. Now, please don't misunderstand, if there has been serious wrongdoing on the part of the Trump administration, then they need to be called out on it. We have already recently had 8 years of "anything-but-transparency" in Washington.

Reading the New York Times would lead one to the conclusion that this was a bad day for the Trump administration. I'm not so sure of that. I'm not huge fan of the President, but have to say that I did not hear anything qualifying as evidence to bring about impeachment pro…