Skip to main content

Considering all the options

Hillary Rodham Clinton (Wellesley College)
Hillary Rodham Clinton (Wellesley College) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
As people all over the country anxiously await the ruling of the Supreme Court on the constitutionality of the healthcare legislation promoted by the current administration, people are scrambling to implement the parts of it they can -- for fear of the legislation being struck down in part or as a whole.

There are great sounding arguments on both sides of the coin.  Conservatives say that the free market is the cure for the economy and the brotherhood of man in general.  Liberals or progressives tout the need to care for our fellow men and women and catch up to the rest of the civilized world in the process.

When I was younger, in the days of Bill and Hillary Clinton, I was a staunch proponent of national healthcare (a single payer system) and backed their plan 100%.  Oh heck, I was practically a socialist.  I have since moved to the right (so to speak) on a lot of issues as I've become older and [hopefully] wiser.  I have to admit, however, as much as I tell myself that I am more conservative than my liberal youth ever believed possible, that my heart still leans toward the single-payer camp.  There are a great many things to like about the current legislation -- especially in terms of not denying claims for pre-existing conditions and kids being able to stay on their parents plans longer.

When the healthcare legislation was crafted and [let's be honest] rammed through Congress, nobody really understood the scope of it (especially Nancy Pelosi). there are certainly things to dislike about it and I am not naive enough to believe that it won't cost us a lot, at least initially, to implement.  Many people of conservative mind have accused the president of ramming it through with his super-majority -- which of course he did.  how else could he have achieved it?  People talk about taking a bi-partisan approach to this but, considering that we can't even get a budget passed in three years, how would we ever deal with something as ideologically prone to debate as healthcare legislation?  What I have maintained about the bill all along is this:  it is a beginning.  Before we write it off in its entirety, I hope we can at least take the time to look at it, learn from it, and save the best of it.

How do you feel about this super-charged, all-important issue facing the American people right now?
Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Slavery

Jesus responded, “I assure you: Everyone who commits sin is a slave of sin. -John 8:34 (HCSB)

All too often, Christians may feel constrained by their faith and what they know to be the expectations of their Heavenly Father. Sometimes, in certain churches, the list of "don'ts" may seem longer than the ancient laws of Israel. Occasionally 'religious' people will sadly get caught up in that sort of thing. That can be a turn-off for many people and a valuable asset to the enemy, who wants you to feel bound by law and a slave to some sort of religious creed. The God I know and love is a God of freedom. I am freer as a slave to Christ than I ever was as a slave to sin. How about you? Are you free in Christ or bound by sin?

Just a bit of DISGUST...

I've got to admit I expected more from the do-nothing body we call Congress with its GOP majority at present. Instead, we got more of the same old tired rhetoric we have been getting for the past 7+ years now about how terrible Obamacare is.

The plan they managed to produce after all this time (Paul Ryan's) is not much better than what is in place and apparently leaves a lot of middle-class people financially screwed. I understand it polled with a 17% approval rate. All I know is the many votes over the past few years to repeal it were nothing more than political grandstanding --  a waste of time and taxpayer money. All the Republicans seem to be able to do is criticize and come up with little to offer themselves. They cannot even seem to reach a consensus among themselves (a problem they have had as long as I can remember).

Personally, I have felt for a long time that they should simply fix what is in place so it works better and offers more flexibility with lower costs. I th…

Get On With It!

When we learned last night of the appointment of special counsel to look into the accusations of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians, we were initially impressed with the measured response from the President. However, as I stated to my wife last night, I would have been surprised if that didn't all change by morning. And so it did. Why can't he leave leave matters alone and keep his fingers off of his smartphone or whatever gadget he uses to bombard Twitter with tweets that signify immaturity and are often caustic, to say the least?

I think if I were President Trump or on his staff I would welcome a special counsel investigation of the matter to put it to bed once and for all. Of course, I offer that with a presumption that he is innocent of accusations that have so far come without any evidence. Robert Mueller's credentials are basically impeccable and he is known as a man who will get to the bottom of things and follow the trail wherever it leads -- not…