Skip to main content

Foreign Policy

As we are all aware, it never takes the opposing side long to offer counter arguments in politics, especially in such an important election year as this.  That being said, it comes as no surprise that the Ryan attackers on the left are in full vigor as they assault Romney's choice for lack of foreign policy experience and his proposed budget (something Harry Reid has seen as important enough to bother creating in the past three years).

I'll discuss the all-important matters of our federal budget and health care in posts to follow, but wish to take a few minutes right now to think about Ryan's lack of foreign policy experience coupled with that of Mitt Romney.  That's an issue that has come up, at least in one blog posting I read on the Huffington Post by Abby Hunstman, one of the Post's political bloggers.  It's actually a fairly well-written article that points out things that bear consideration.  While we are largely focused on the poor economy in this election season, our foreign policy is definitely linked to it in a very deep and meaningful way.  How we conduct our financial affairs in the global market and the relationships we maintain with our global trading partners are key to our economic vitality.  If one of average intelligence stops to give it even a moment's consideration, no explanation of that premise need be offered.

So now we have young Paul Ryan with no real foreign policy experience whatsoever.  Add to that his presidential running mate Mitt Romney, also with no foreign policy experience and what do you have?  No foreign policy experience x2.  Is that a problem?  I suppose it could be, but let's consider some other things we know to be true.

President Obama came to office after a somewhat lackluster, brief career in the Senate.  Coupled with no foreign policy experience, he really had no business experience, either.  He chose Joe Biden as his running mate.  Well, by now we all know our Vice President, don't we?  Supposedly he was to bring a treasure trove of foreign policy experience and knowledge to the table.  I'll let you decide the value of what he has offered to our country, in terms of experience and profitable foreign policy.  Our current foreign policy (which is arguably difficult to understand as it seems to change from moment to moment) has not done much to stave off the economic tidal wave that has hit Europe and our banking system as well (many claim it started here).  One point of note:  countries that have fared the best and have had the best immunity from this global recession tend to govern more conservatively and adopted austerity measures early on.

My point is simply this: This isn't an argument for voting a Romney/Ryan ticket in November; I am simply illustrating that an argument for the value of "foreign policy experience" to help fix the ills of our economy is a tough one to make when he have little to nothing to show for the "experience" that has led us to this point.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Slavery

Jesus responded, “I assure you: Everyone who commits sin is a slave of sin. -John 8:34 (HCSB)

All too often, Christians may feel constrained by their faith and what they know to be the expectations of their Heavenly Father. Sometimes, in certain churches, the list of "don'ts" may seem longer than the ancient laws of Israel. Occasionally 'religious' people will sadly get caught up in that sort of thing. That can be a turn-off for many people and a valuable asset to the enemy, who wants you to feel bound by law and a slave to some sort of religious creed. The God I know and love is a God of freedom. I am freer as a slave to Christ than I ever was as a slave to sin. How about you? Are you free in Christ or bound by sin?

Just a bit of DISGUST...

I've got to admit I expected more from the do-nothing body we call Congress with its GOP majority at present. Instead, we got more of the same old tired rhetoric we have been getting for the past 7+ years now about how terrible Obamacare is.

The plan they managed to produce after all this time (Paul Ryan's) is not much better than what is in place and apparently leaves a lot of middle-class people financially screwed. I understand it polled with a 17% approval rate. All I know is the many votes over the past few years to repeal it were nothing more than political grandstanding --  a waste of time and taxpayer money. All the Republicans seem to be able to do is criticize and come up with little to offer themselves. They cannot even seem to reach a consensus among themselves (a problem they have had as long as I can remember).

Personally, I have felt for a long time that they should simply fix what is in place so it works better and offers more flexibility with lower costs. I th…

Get On With It!

When we learned last night of the appointment of special counsel to look into the accusations of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians, we were initially impressed with the measured response from the President. However, as I stated to my wife last night, I would have been surprised if that didn't all change by morning. And so it did. Why can't he leave leave matters alone and keep his fingers off of his smartphone or whatever gadget he uses to bombard Twitter with tweets that signify immaturity and are often caustic, to say the least?

I think if I were President Trump or on his staff I would welcome a special counsel investigation of the matter to put it to bed once and for all. Of course, I offer that with a presumption that he is innocent of accusations that have so far come without any evidence. Robert Mueller's credentials are basically impeccable and he is known as a man who will get to the bottom of things and follow the trail wherever it leads -- not…