Skip to main content

Foreign Policy

As we are all aware, it never takes the opposing side long to offer counter arguments in politics, especially in such an important election year as this.  That being said, it comes as no surprise that the Ryan attackers on the left are in full vigor as they assault Romney's choice for lack of foreign policy experience and his proposed budget (something Harry Reid has seen as important enough to bother creating in the past three years).

I'll discuss the all-important matters of our federal budget and health care in posts to follow, but wish to take a few minutes right now to think about Ryan's lack of foreign policy experience coupled with that of Mitt Romney.  That's an issue that has come up, at least in one blog posting I read on the Huffington Post by Abby Hunstman, one of the Post's political bloggers.  It's actually a fairly well-written article that points out things that bear consideration.  While we are largely focused on the poor economy in this election season, our foreign policy is definitely linked to it in a very deep and meaningful way.  How we conduct our financial affairs in the global market and the relationships we maintain with our global trading partners are key to our economic vitality.  If one of average intelligence stops to give it even a moment's consideration, no explanation of that premise need be offered.

So now we have young Paul Ryan with no real foreign policy experience whatsoever.  Add to that his presidential running mate Mitt Romney, also with no foreign policy experience and what do you have?  No foreign policy experience x2.  Is that a problem?  I suppose it could be, but let's consider some other things we know to be true.

President Obama came to office after a somewhat lackluster, brief career in the Senate.  Coupled with no foreign policy experience, he really had no business experience, either.  He chose Joe Biden as his running mate.  Well, by now we all know our Vice President, don't we?  Supposedly he was to bring a treasure trove of foreign policy experience and knowledge to the table.  I'll let you decide the value of what he has offered to our country, in terms of experience and profitable foreign policy.  Our current foreign policy (which is arguably difficult to understand as it seems to change from moment to moment) has not done much to stave off the economic tidal wave that has hit Europe and our banking system as well (many claim it started here).  One point of note:  countries that have fared the best and have had the best immunity from this global recession tend to govern more conservatively and adopted austerity measures early on.

My point is simply this: This isn't an argument for voting a Romney/Ryan ticket in November; I am simply illustrating that an argument for the value of "foreign policy experience" to help fix the ills of our economy is a tough one to make when he have little to nothing to show for the "experience" that has led us to this point.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering Why

I was watching Bill O'Reilly this evening as he interviewed Tony Orlando, who has agreed to perform at the Armed Services Ball. Not only is he doing it for the veterans, he is doing it for America -- out of respect for our tradition of a peaceful transfer of power. He made it clear that, had Hillary won and asked him to perform, he would do the same. It is not a partisan thing. It's about America, not an individual. Bravo, Tony. A true patriotic American.

Think, not react...

The 'action-reaction' scenario that has been playing out between progressives and conservatives is a situation that is becoming increasingly counter-productive and harmful. This is obviously not something new; the battle between left and right has been raging for a long time and those flames were also well-fanned by the previous administration and ineffective congress. Sadly, what happens is a loss of focus on issues that we should be working together to solve and increase in counter-productive squabbling. The level of immaturity being witnessed as coming from our 45th president is unfortunate. Less use of Twitter would serve him better, provided he actually took the time to build better relationships with key figures in the media. Some of it has been nothing short of childish and the sort of thing I might have engaged in as a 12 year old, were Twitter in existence then.

President Trump's tendency to engage in knee-jerk reactions is unfortunate. A case in point is his exec…

The Value of a Letter

I can't say with any certainty when the last time I wrote a letter to anybody was. I can tell you that I remember the last several emails I have sent or received -- but to actually write and mail a letter? I have given this a little thought today as I heard someone talking about it on a Christian radio station I favor and listen to very often. He mentioned that he cannot recall anyone ever telling him that they received his email "at the right time" or how much it really meant to them. I am sure that some of us can say we have received such a response. However, as I reflect on that, those times are few and far between.

In thinking about the time and effort it takes to put pen to paper and then actually stick on a stamp on it and mail it, I can see where it could well mean much more to the recipient than a simple text or email. Perhaps that is what I like so much about getting Christmas cards -- especially those with notes in them.

Just thinking...