Skip to main content

Fiscal Cliff

I wrote this and posted it at my other blog (davew0958.wordpress.com), deciding to re-post it here:

I have heard more than one commentator say that the American people expect the various factions of Congress to “get along.” I’m not sure I buy that, especially when “getting along” means compromising on core beliefs that many consider too vital to budge on, even a little. It may just be that the American voter is more responsible for this pending ‘cliff’ than the members of Congress are.
The big issue here (for Democrats, at least) is the desire to raise taxes on those making more than $250,000 per year. Their argument is that the wealthiest Americans aren’t paying their “fair share” and the majority of our citizens think they should pay more. While I don’t doubt that most Americans think those making over 250K should pay more, I must point out that most Americans don’t make that amount –so it’s easy to finger point and act like it should be no big deal –when it’s not coming out of your wallet.
On the other hand, Republicans think that over-spending is the problem here, not revenue -and the rich already pay the lion’s share of our country’s revenue. They accuse the Democrats of not being willing to compromise on entitlement reforms.
So where is the truth? As always, I suspect it is somewhere in the middle. I do not, for one minute, believe that letting the tax cuts expire for the wealthiest Americans will somehow cause the rich to suddenly decide to stop expanding. Wealthy people don’t create jobs for some philanthropic reason, or specifically because they are paying less taxes, they do so because it serves their bottom line. Nothing saintly about it. Just capitalism, plain and simple. History proves this to be true. Higher taxes will not stifle expansion. In fact, wealthy citizens may actually invest more to increase their revenues to counter losses from additional taxes. What will happen if we fail to extend tax cuts for common, ordinary people who drive this economy through spending, thereby indirectly employing people to create goods and  services to meet demand, is that they will pull back their limited resources from spending and investing to meet the added demand of Uncle Sam’s voracious appetite for spending of late.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Slavery

Jesus responded, “I assure you: Everyone who commits sin is a slave of sin. -John 8:34 (HCSB)

All too often, Christians may feel constrained by their faith and what they know to be the expectations of their Heavenly Father. Sometimes, in certain churches, the list of "don'ts" may seem longer than the ancient laws of Israel. Occasionally 'religious' people will sadly get caught up in that sort of thing. That can be a turn-off for many people and a valuable asset to the enemy, who wants you to feel bound by law and a slave to some sort of religious creed. The God I know and love is a God of freedom. I am freer as a slave to Christ than I ever was as a slave to sin. How about you? Are you free in Christ or bound by sin?

Just a bit of DISGUST...

I've got to admit I expected more from the do-nothing body we call Congress with its GOP majority at present. Instead, we got more of the same old tired rhetoric we have been getting for the past 7+ years now about how terrible Obamacare is.

The plan they managed to produce after all this time (Paul Ryan's) is not much better than what is in place and apparently leaves a lot of middle-class people financially screwed. I understand it polled with a 17% approval rate. All I know is the many votes over the past few years to repeal it were nothing more than political grandstanding --  a waste of time and taxpayer money. All the Republicans seem to be able to do is criticize and come up with little to offer themselves. They cannot even seem to reach a consensus among themselves (a problem they have had as long as I can remember).

Personally, I have felt for a long time that they should simply fix what is in place so it works better and offers more flexibility with lower costs. I th…

Get On With It!

When we learned last night of the appointment of special counsel to look into the accusations of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians, we were initially impressed with the measured response from the President. However, as I stated to my wife last night, I would have been surprised if that didn't all change by morning. And so it did. Why can't he leave leave matters alone and keep his fingers off of his smartphone or whatever gadget he uses to bombard Twitter with tweets that signify immaturity and are often caustic, to say the least?

I think if I were President Trump or on his staff I would welcome a special counsel investigation of the matter to put it to bed once and for all. Of course, I offer that with a presumption that he is innocent of accusations that have so far come without any evidence. Robert Mueller's credentials are basically impeccable and he is known as a man who will get to the bottom of things and follow the trail wherever it leads -- not…