Skip to main content

NY Times Op-Ed

Fox News Channel
So I'm watching Greta on the Fox News network last night and she casually mentions the op-ed by Putin that was just published in the New York Times. Being on the cusp of sleep, I wasn't sure if I heard what she said correctly and grabbed my tablet from the nightstand drawer, launched the NY Times app and headed for the op-ed section to discover that it wasn't part of some dream I was embarking on. The Russian president had indeed elected to address the American people through an op-ed in the NY Times.

I took the time to read the piece rather than simply criticize the paper for printing it--as I'm sure some will. I guess that, if I had a real criticism to level, it would be the timing: 9/11. Couldn't they have waited a few more hours to post it?  Aside from that, it actually wasn't badly written--especially if you wish to defend and protect the credentials of the United Nations. Personally, I'm not sure that I do. Moreover, I think he hides his real agenda in protecting Assad--as that protects his interests, as well. Anybody who loves politics will enjoy this all-you-can-eat buffet of rhetoric and blame-gaming.

I know that Putin offended many in this country with his caution against our thinking of ourselves as 'exceptional.' Already, the conservative talkers on the radio are buzzing about this. Who cares? Do you really expect the president of another country [that has often taken an adversarial position in regard to us] is going to agree with our self-view of exceptional-ism? Of course not. Would you in his position? Perhaps he is right, anyway. There was a time when I thought of our country as exceptional--when it was "one nation under God." That seems to have changed. God is not allowed in public schools anymore. Crosses are being ordered taken down. The pledge of allegiance is not recited in schools anymore for fear of offending anyone with mention of God. Abortion is rampant, as are children born out of wedlock. Throughout recorded history, and in Bible in particular, the downfall of many nations is preceded by a departure from reverence for almighty God.

Whatever Putin's real reasons for protecting the regime of Assad, the end goal seems to be the same as mine: let's keep the U.S. out of it. Enjoying history as I do, there's no way that we can commit a 'limited strike' without 'boots on the ground' and cause any real positive affect on the situation. Time and time again, our history shows us this. In addition to that, even if we were somehow able to cripple his military might and bring about his eventual downfall, what would the cost of our efforts actually yield us? Answer: likely nothing good. Probably something bad. Perhaps another radical Islamic faction bent on our destruction? Sound at all familiar?

Personally, I couldn't care less about the United Nations. I think it's a drain on our resources, corrupt and often ineffectual. The well-being and integrity of the U.N. does not for one minute enter into my thoughts when it comes to why I think we should not involve ourselves in this affair. The plain and simple fact of the matter is that we cannot afford it. We do not have the financial resources, military assets and will to invest in another country's affairs. Sorry. It is not in the best interest of the United States, nor does it threaten our national security at this time. Let those who cry out for war and more war go fight the battle themselves. The American people do not want this. Frankly, as I interpret the constitution, it does not permit this without congressional approval. That's my point of view.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Slavery

Jesus responded, “I assure you: Everyone who commits sin is a slave of sin. -John 8:34 (HCSB)

All too often, Christians may feel constrained by their faith and what they know to be the expectations of their Heavenly Father. Sometimes, in certain churches, the list of "don'ts" may seem longer than the ancient laws of Israel. Occasionally 'religious' people will sadly get caught up in that sort of thing. That can be a turn-off for many people and a valuable asset to the enemy, who wants you to feel bound by law and a slave to some sort of religious creed. The God I know and love is a God of freedom. I am freer as a slave to Christ than I ever was as a slave to sin. How about you? Are you free in Christ or bound by sin?

Just a bit of DISGUST...

I've got to admit I expected more from the do-nothing body we call Congress with its GOP majority at present. Instead, we got more of the same old tired rhetoric we have been getting for the past 7+ years now about how terrible Obamacare is.

The plan they managed to produce after all this time (Paul Ryan's) is not much better than what is in place and apparently leaves a lot of middle-class people financially screwed. I understand it polled with a 17% approval rate. All I know is the many votes over the past few years to repeal it were nothing more than political grandstanding --  a waste of time and taxpayer money. All the Republicans seem to be able to do is criticize and come up with little to offer themselves. They cannot even seem to reach a consensus among themselves (a problem they have had as long as I can remember).

Personally, I have felt for a long time that they should simply fix what is in place so it works better and offers more flexibility with lower costs. I th…

Get On With It!

When we learned last night of the appointment of special counsel to look into the accusations of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians, we were initially impressed with the measured response from the President. However, as I stated to my wife last night, I would have been surprised if that didn't all change by morning. And so it did. Why can't he leave leave matters alone and keep his fingers off of his smartphone or whatever gadget he uses to bombard Twitter with tweets that signify immaturity and are often caustic, to say the least?

I think if I were President Trump or on his staff I would welcome a special counsel investigation of the matter to put it to bed once and for all. Of course, I offer that with a presumption that he is innocent of accusations that have so far come without any evidence. Robert Mueller's credentials are basically impeccable and he is known as a man who will get to the bottom of things and follow the trail wherever it leads -- not…