Skip to main content

Thinking about 2016?

English: Depiction of the Senate vote on H.R. ...
Are you thinking about 2016? I'm not yet, although there are plenty of folks on both sides of the aisle who apparently are. Actually I guess that (since I'm writing this post) I am thinking about it! A lot of speculation is floating around about Chris Christie as a potential GOP front runner, as well as Ted Cruz, Rand Paul and on the other side, everybody's favorite "what does it matter" candidate Hillary Clinton.

Where we go from here (and the future of the Republican party) will have a lot to do with the outcome of the 2014 midterm elections. By all accounts, with the plethora of scandals, lack of economic progress, disastrous roll-out of Obamacare [and subsequent lies told around that] it should be a cinch for the Republicans to clean up. But, then again, I scratch my head at the GOP's choice for nominee and the spectacular loss he suffered to Obama.

If there was ever a time for a truly conservative presidential candidate, this is it. With liberal big-spending ideas proving to be ineffective and ultimately more harmful--and the lies told to push these things through in Congress and by the American people, those who have typically been opposed to those ideas should win in landslides against their liberal Democratic components. They should. However, it is one thing to have conservative principles and quite another to be effective. What this country doesn't need is to continue in the stalled, ineffective grip of a Congress who can't get along with each other or the executive branch. We need a conservative who can act as a centrist when necessary to achieve the kind of compromise necessary to truly govern a country. We don't need a make-believe conservative who will say whatever is necessary to get the nomination and then, after being elected, turn into another big government "RINO." Remember Richard Nixon? Frankly, George W. Bush wasn't exactly the conservative poster child, either. We need balance. While I admire Ron Paul and many of the ideas and values he stands for, I think he would be the wrong choice for president. There are things that can't be left unattended for long periods of time while we stand on principle and refuse to budge in order to get things done,.

One of the biggest things that conservatives need to overcome to get elected is the desire for free stuff from the government. I've heard it described as an American issue; I tend to think it's part of the human condition. We like free things. One thing I have noticed is that the items I get for free I tend to care for less. There seems to be a deeper attachment if it is something I have worked for, except for God's grace--which is a whole different matter for an entirely different blog.

My hope and prayer is that we can find a common ground and come up with an electable candidate to change direction in this country. Hillary Clinton would be the wrong choice. her failed leadership as Secretary of State, her disposition and her dishonesty (Benghazi) make her undeserving of the highest office of the land and a BAD choice for America. "What does it matter?" It matters a lot. Ask the families of those dead Americans.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering Why

I was watching Bill O'Reilly this evening as he interviewed Tony Orlando, who has agreed to perform at the Armed Services Ball. Not only is he doing it for the veterans, he is doing it for America -- out of respect for our tradition of a peaceful transfer of power. He made it clear that, had Hillary won and asked him to perform, he would do the same. It is not a partisan thing. It's about America, not an individual. Bravo, Tony. A true patriotic American.

Think, not react...

The 'action-reaction' scenario that has been playing out between progressives and conservatives is a situation that is becoming increasingly counter-productive and harmful. This is obviously not something new; the battle between left and right has been raging for a long time and those flames were also well-fanned by the previous administration and ineffective congress. Sadly, what happens is a loss of focus on issues that we should be working together to solve and increase in counter-productive squabbling. The level of immaturity being witnessed as coming from our 45th president is unfortunate. Less use of Twitter would serve him better, provided he actually took the time to build better relationships with key figures in the media. Some of it has been nothing short of childish and the sort of thing I might have engaged in as a 12 year old, were Twitter in existence then.

President Trump's tendency to engage in knee-jerk reactions is unfortunate. A case in point is his exec…

Just a bit of DISGUST...

I've got to admit I expected more from the do-nothing body we call Congress with its GOP majority at present. Instead, we got more of the same old tired rhetoric we have been getting for the past 7+ years now about how terrible Obamacare is.

The plan they managed to produce after all this time (Paul Ryan's) is not much better than what is in place and apparently leaves a lot of middle-class people financially screwed. I understand it polled with a 17% approval rate. All I know is the many votes over the past few years to repeal it were nothing more than political grandstanding --  a waste of time and taxpayer money. All the Republicans seem to be able to do is criticize and come up with little to offer themselves. They cannot even seem to reach a consensus among themselves (a problem they have had as long as I can remember).

Personally, I have felt for a long time that they should simply fix what is in place so it works better and offers more flexibility with lower costs. I th…