Skip to main content

Thinking about 2016?

English: Depiction of the Senate vote on H.R. ...
Are you thinking about 2016? I'm not yet, although there are plenty of folks on both sides of the aisle who apparently are. Actually I guess that (since I'm writing this post) I am thinking about it! A lot of speculation is floating around about Chris Christie as a potential GOP front runner, as well as Ted Cruz, Rand Paul and on the other side, everybody's favorite "what does it matter" candidate Hillary Clinton.

Where we go from here (and the future of the Republican party) will have a lot to do with the outcome of the 2014 midterm elections. By all accounts, with the plethora of scandals, lack of economic progress, disastrous roll-out of Obamacare [and subsequent lies told around that] it should be a cinch for the Republicans to clean up. But, then again, I scratch my head at the GOP's choice for nominee and the spectacular loss he suffered to Obama.

If there was ever a time for a truly conservative presidential candidate, this is it. With liberal big-spending ideas proving to be ineffective and ultimately more harmful--and the lies told to push these things through in Congress and by the American people, those who have typically been opposed to those ideas should win in landslides against their liberal Democratic components. They should. However, it is one thing to have conservative principles and quite another to be effective. What this country doesn't need is to continue in the stalled, ineffective grip of a Congress who can't get along with each other or the executive branch. We need a conservative who can act as a centrist when necessary to achieve the kind of compromise necessary to truly govern a country. We don't need a make-believe conservative who will say whatever is necessary to get the nomination and then, after being elected, turn into another big government "RINO." Remember Richard Nixon? Frankly, George W. Bush wasn't exactly the conservative poster child, either. We need balance. While I admire Ron Paul and many of the ideas and values he stands for, I think he would be the wrong choice for president. There are things that can't be left unattended for long periods of time while we stand on principle and refuse to budge in order to get things done,.

One of the biggest things that conservatives need to overcome to get elected is the desire for free stuff from the government. I've heard it described as an American issue; I tend to think it's part of the human condition. We like free things. One thing I have noticed is that the items I get for free I tend to care for less. There seems to be a deeper attachment if it is something I have worked for, except for God's grace--which is a whole different matter for an entirely different blog.

My hope and prayer is that we can find a common ground and come up with an electable candidate to change direction in this country. Hillary Clinton would be the wrong choice. her failed leadership as Secretary of State, her disposition and her dishonesty (Benghazi) make her undeserving of the highest office of the land and a BAD choice for America. "What does it matter?" It matters a lot. Ask the families of those dead Americans.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Slavery

Jesus responded, “I assure you: Everyone who commits sin is a slave of sin. -John 8:34 (HCSB)

All too often, Christians may feel constrained by their faith and what they know to be the expectations of their Heavenly Father. Sometimes, in certain churches, the list of "don'ts" may seem longer than the ancient laws of Israel. Occasionally 'religious' people will sadly get caught up in that sort of thing. That can be a turn-off for many people and a valuable asset to the enemy, who wants you to feel bound by law and a slave to some sort of religious creed. The God I know and love is a God of freedom. I am freer as a slave to Christ than I ever was as a slave to sin. How about you? Are you free in Christ or bound by sin?

Hate Speech

The amount of vitriol directed at President Trump seems to be unprecedented. At least, that is what those on the right seem to think. Of course, I remember plenty of criticism and hate speech hurled at President Obama during his time in office, as well. I don't think I really need to mention President George W. Bush, do I?

There has never been (in my lifetime) such a level of animosity between opposing viewpoints as I see in today's America. Democrats hurl murderous accusations against the Republicans for their healthcare proposals and those of a conservative view sling accusations of incompetence and hypocrisy back at them. Of course, either side is generally pretty good at documenting their accusations with freshly spun 'facts.'

No matter where you fit into the political spectrum, it is important to note that such contention is counter-productive. Whenever people react at the behest of their emotions, clear-headed and rational decisions are nowhere to be found. Moreo…

Treason or Patriotism?

Many years ago, the Democrats couldn't wait to get all of the facts surrounding Watergate out in the public eye. The Washington Post has been celebrated as a bastion of the free press recently in a movie (which we have yet to see, but plan to).


Now, the idea of releasing a memo that may indicate wrong-doing on the part of the FBI and DOJ is hailed as treasonous by some who would prefer the secrets remain secrets. I have seen or heard of nothing in the recently released memo that would appear to compromise national security -- have you?