Skip to main content

My Brother's [and Sister's] Keeper

Dignify those who are down on their luck;
    you’ll feel good—that’s what God does.
God looks after us all,
    makes us robust with life—
Lucky to be in the land,
    we’re free from enemy worries.
Whenever we’re sick and in bed,
    God becomes our nurse,
    nurses us back to health.
-Psalm 41:1-3 (The Message)

Am I "my brother's keeper?" The Bible certainly points to that-- in passage after passage. I chose the paraphrase known as "The Message" by Eugene Peterson to begin this post because I feel it best explains the intent of the psalmist in these verses. Many people are "down on their luck," possibly because the job they held for many years has suddenly vaporized or some calamity has befallen them, such as an unexpected health issue or some other catastrophic problem. Life is full of uncertainty, as most adults are well aware of through some experience of their own. But whose job is it to take care of those who suffer setbacks? Is it solely the responsibility of individuals in a society or chiefly within the job description of government? If the answer is "both," then what percentage of the caretaker role does each have?

Then the Lord said to Cain, “Where is your brother Abel?” He said, “I do not know; am I my brother’s keeper?” -Genesis 4:9 (NRSV)

In the United States we basically have a two party system. I hate to offend my libertarian brothers and sisters and those of other lesser-known parties, but that's the way it is. On the conservative side, voices cry for less government intervention in the lives of its citizens, pointing to the unnecessary expenditures on people that often don't need it and the tendency to actually harm those it is trying to help by a "cradle to grave" mentality. Such a mentality, they assert, removes any incentive to be self-sufficient and creating total dependence on Uncle Sam. On the other side, progressives call for more action on the part of government, pointing out corporate greed and an "all for me" attitude with little to no regard for those who have little. They do not trust that people will, of their own accord, be their "brother's keeper."

I really don't believe that most conservatives don't care about those less fortunate and are only concerned with what they can get [any more than any other person does]. I also don't believe that those on the other end of the political spectrum hold people in such low esteem as to think they have no heart or concern for their fellow man. Somewhere in the middle, where it often lives, is the truth. So where am I going with this, other than stating what is [to most] the obvious? I pushing for more balance in the system, more of the middle of the road type of thinking.

Social safety nets are critical and an integral part of our society. People balked when Social Security came about-- yet now they struggle to save this endangered resource for aging and disabled Americans. People were alarmed at the idea of the F.D.I.C.-- which has now protected American's savings successfully for decades. I could cite many more examples of how we  have resisted change, suspicious of the intent, yet later have come to embrace it, but I think I have made my point. It may well yet be the way "Obama Care" ends up being remembered. I don't know.

What I do know is that the Church always needs to step up to the plate more often than it does. I'm not talking about Roman Catholics, Lutherans, Methodists or any denomination in particular-- I'm talking about the body of Christ: The Church with the "Big C."

Balance. That's the word of the day here. As Christians we need to do more. Christ always calls us to that task. As Americans we need to care more about each other's welfare. Not everybody is Christian or compelled to care for anybody or anything beyond the end of their own nose. That's a sad fact of life. For that reason alone, we need some "safety nets" in place: some rules of "fair play." This isn't a Republican or Democratic thing-- it's just simple decency. It's what we would probably want if we suddenly found ourselves on the "receiving end" of life.

Then the king will say to those at his right hand, ‘Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me.’ -Matthew 25:34-36 (NRSV)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Slavery

Jesus responded, “I assure you: Everyone who commits sin is a slave of sin. -John 8:34 (HCSB)

All too often, Christians may feel constrained by their faith and what they know to be the expectations of their Heavenly Father. Sometimes, in certain churches, the list of "don'ts" may seem longer than the ancient laws of Israel. Occasionally 'religious' people will sadly get caught up in that sort of thing. That can be a turn-off for many people and a valuable asset to the enemy, who wants you to feel bound by law and a slave to some sort of religious creed. The God I know and love is a God of freedom. I am freer as a slave to Christ than I ever was as a slave to sin. How about you? Are you free in Christ or bound by sin?

Hate Speech

The amount of vitriol directed at President Trump seems to be unprecedented. At least, that is what those on the right seem to think. Of course, I remember plenty of criticism and hate speech hurled at President Obama during his time in office, as well. I don't think I really need to mention President George W. Bush, do I?

There has never been (in my lifetime) such a level of animosity between opposing viewpoints as I see in today's America. Democrats hurl murderous accusations against the Republicans for their healthcare proposals and those of a conservative view sling accusations of incompetence and hypocrisy back at them. Of course, either side is generally pretty good at documenting their accusations with freshly spun 'facts.'

No matter where you fit into the political spectrum, it is important to note that such contention is counter-productive. Whenever people react at the behest of their emotions, clear-headed and rational decisions are nowhere to be found. Moreo…

Treason or Patriotism?

Many years ago, the Democrats couldn't wait to get all of the facts surrounding Watergate out in the public eye. The Washington Post has been celebrated as a bastion of the free press recently in a movie (which we have yet to see, but plan to).


Now, the idea of releasing a memo that may indicate wrong-doing on the part of the FBI and DOJ is hailed as treasonous by some who would prefer the secrets remain secrets. I have seen or heard of nothing in the recently released memo that would appear to compromise national security -- have you?