Ever notice how attorneys often have a way of speaking and phrasing things that seems almost to be deliberately confusing? I was reminded of that yesterday in dealing with an attorney-- who was trying his best to be vague, elusive and deny things he said in the past that I clearly remember being stated. This is not a huge issue; I am frustrated, however, because I sense some dishonesty afloat. If true, it's on him and the consequence of the law of reciprocity will probably apply. My life goes on despite this possible deception and we continue to be very blessed. The moral to this story? Get anything in writing when talking with an attorney about any matter involving real estate or money and their possible liability.
Many years ago, the Democrats couldn't wait to get all of the facts surrounding Watergate out in the public eye. The Washington Post has been celebrated as a bastion of the free press recently in a movie (which we have yet to see, but plan to).
Now, the idea of releasing a memo that may indicate wrong-doing on the part of the FBI and DOJ is hailed as treasonous by some who would prefer the secrets remain secrets. I have seen or heard of nothing in the recently released memo that would appear to compromise national security -- have you?
Now, the idea of releasing a memo that may indicate wrong-doing on the part of the FBI and DOJ is hailed as treasonous by some who would prefer the secrets remain secrets. I have seen or heard of nothing in the recently released memo that would appear to compromise national security -- have you?
Comments
Post a Comment