Skip to main content

Norwich Taxes

Why do taxes keep going up? There's the “$64,000 question!” Recently I commented on a Norwich Bulletin article regarding the City of Norwich budget proposal which they are currently delaying until they have an idea of what the State is going to cough up (the basically broke state, I might add). The proposal in the works does, of course, include a 6+ % increase.

Naturally, as is usually the case with any matter involving politics and especially money, someone posted comments about the issue, sticking up for the council and insisting that they don't indiscriminately spend the taxpayer's dollar. Really? I have to wonder if the budget process they use to arrive at their conclusion of the need for more money is the same as they would use with their personal household finances? Sorry, but it is much easier to be generous with someone else's money than your own.

Unlike some commenters, who seize the opportunity to “take it out” on folks using their keyboard, the comment of the person defending the council was civil and, in many ways, well thought-out. I understand that there are factors that must be taken into account when budgeting that are impossible or, at least, hard to control and predict.

Someone else brought up an interesting point that I shall pose in the form of a question: how is it fair that renters who have children in the school district (education being a huge part of the budget) contribute far less than homeowners do toward the education of their children? How is right that property owners must bear the brunt of the expense, even if they have no children? It hardly seems right that someone with one or more children in the public school system that has an adequate income (but happens to rent vs. own) pays a fraction of what someone who owns even a modest house does? In fact, if the renting parent [or parents] does not own a vehicle, they pay even less into the local community. How is that fair if they have the means to pay? I have no issue with contributing to provide a decent quality education to the children of our community. I only ask that people with the children that are actually benefiting from our schools pay an appropriate share of the cost.

If the the tax structure was more fair towards the property owner and the business owner, perhaps the city could attract something we have seen very little of in the past several years: employers. I believe they would come if they were treated fairly and the taxes were reasonable-- not going up and up every year.

What are your thoughts?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Slavery

Jesus responded, “I assure you: Everyone who commits sin is a slave of sin. -John 8:34 (HCSB)

All too often, Christians may feel constrained by their faith and what they know to be the expectations of their Heavenly Father. Sometimes, in certain churches, the list of "don'ts" may seem longer than the ancient laws of Israel. Occasionally 'religious' people will sadly get caught up in that sort of thing. That can be a turn-off for many people and a valuable asset to the enemy, who wants you to feel bound by law and a slave to some sort of religious creed. The God I know and love is a God of freedom. I am freer as a slave to Christ than I ever was as a slave to sin. How about you? Are you free in Christ or bound by sin?

Just a bit of DISGUST...

I've got to admit I expected more from the do-nothing body we call Congress with its GOP majority at present. Instead, we got more of the same old tired rhetoric we have been getting for the past 7+ years now about how terrible Obamacare is.

The plan they managed to produce after all this time (Paul Ryan's) is not much better than what is in place and apparently leaves a lot of middle-class people financially screwed. I understand it polled with a 17% approval rate. All I know is the many votes over the past few years to repeal it were nothing more than political grandstanding --  a waste of time and taxpayer money. All the Republicans seem to be able to do is criticize and come up with little to offer themselves. They cannot even seem to reach a consensus among themselves (a problem they have had as long as I can remember).

Personally, I have felt for a long time that they should simply fix what is in place so it works better and offers more flexibility with lower costs. I th…

Get On With It!

When we learned last night of the appointment of special counsel to look into the accusations of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians, we were initially impressed with the measured response from the President. However, as I stated to my wife last night, I would have been surprised if that didn't all change by morning. And so it did. Why can't he leave leave matters alone and keep his fingers off of his smartphone or whatever gadget he uses to bombard Twitter with tweets that signify immaturity and are often caustic, to say the least?

I think if I were President Trump or on his staff I would welcome a special counsel investigation of the matter to put it to bed once and for all. Of course, I offer that with a presumption that he is innocent of accusations that have so far come without any evidence. Robert Mueller's credentials are basically impeccable and he is known as a man who will get to the bottom of things and follow the trail wherever it leads -- not…