Skip to main content

The Superiority of the King James Bible

I never quite warmed up to the demeanor of the "King James Onlyists," who really seem to me to be a little mean-spirited in the execution of their agenda and will consider nothing other than the King James Version as the English-speaking Word of God. Every now and then, somebody tries to introduce something that is called a 'modern-update' of the KJV, based on the same time-honored manuscripts (by the way, I do consider the Textus Receptus to be the most reliable), only to have it picked apart, "exposed" and shot down by the KJV-only crowd. Examples of this include the New King James Version, the Modern English Version, the American King James Version and the King James 'Easy Read' version. While I have never read the American King James Version, I am familiar with the others and would trust them as accurate translations of the Word of God by God-fearing brothers and sisters. In fact, I scoffed when the MEV recently came out, thinking the last thing we need is yet another "do-over of the King James" until I picked up a copy and started reading it. I think it is well done and the closest to the original King James of any of the modern translations of the same manuscripts. It is within the realm of possibility that I could even find myself preferring it to the New King James as time goes on.

I still love the King James Version the best and enjoy reading and studying from it-- because, when I do, I am very aware of the fact that I am reading the Bible and not some work of man-- such as a novel or commentary. I believe that the King James Bible contains all the verses of God's Word that are intended for me to study, learn and grow from. While I still enjoy reading and quoting from other modern versions of the Bible (The New Living Translation has a special place in my heart, among others), I do consider the KJV my 'go-to' standard in translations. When somebody says the word "Bible," the King James Version is what comes to mind.

I would love to read your comments on the subject-- provided they are presented in a civil, loving manner as a brother or sister in the LORD would be expected to write them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Treason or Patriotism?

Many years ago, the Democrats couldn't wait to get all of the facts surrounding Watergate out in the public eye. The Washington Post has been celebrated as a bastion of the free press recently in a movie (which we have yet to see, but plan to).


Now, the idea of releasing a memo that may indicate wrong-doing on the part of the FBI and DOJ is hailed as treasonous by some who would prefer the secrets remain secrets. I have seen or heard of nothing in the recently released memo that would appear to compromise national security -- have you?

Hate Speech

The amount of vitriol directed at President Trump seems to be unprecedented. At least, that is what those on the right seem to think. Of course, I remember plenty of criticism and hate speech hurled at President Obama during his time in office, as well. I don't think I really need to mention President George W. Bush, do I?

There has never been (in my lifetime) such a level of animosity between opposing viewpoints as I see in today's America. Democrats hurl murderous accusations against the Republicans for their healthcare proposals and those of a conservative view sling accusations of incompetence and hypocrisy back at them. Of course, either side is generally pretty good at documenting their accusations with freshly spun 'facts.'

No matter where you fit into the political spectrum, it is important to note that such contention is counter-productive. Whenever people react at the behest of their emotions, clear-headed and rational decisions are nowhere to be found. Moreo…

Comey Testimony

It's been a while since I have seen the kind of hype that there has been around having Director Comey testify in front of the Senate today. It seems worse than Watergate! There also seems to be no evidence thus far except for of the here-say variety .

No less than 5 times did he call President Trump (or his administration) a liar. Aside from what that does to the office of the President, it takes away from getting things done that so desperately need to get done. Now, please don't misunderstand, if there has been serious wrongdoing on the part of the Trump administration, then they need to be called out on it. We have already recently had 8 years of "anything-but-transparency" in Washington.

Reading the New York Times would lead one to the conclusion that this was a bad day for the Trump administration. I'm not so sure of that. I'm not huge fan of the President, but have to say that I did not hear anything qualifying as evidence to bring about impeachment pro…