Skip to main content

GOP Debate 11.10.2015

The red "GOP" logo used by the party...
The red "GOP" logo used by the party for its website (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
I watched both GOP debates last night on the Fox Business Network and have to say that I was much more impressed with the quality of the questions and behavior of the moderators than I was with CNBC. I don't say that because I am conservative or somehow allied with any Fox network-- believe me, I could live without Bill O'Reilly or Shawn Hannity! (I should say as a matter of full disclosure that, even though I find O'Reilly to be somewhat arrogant and egotistical, I do like several of his books).

I'm not going to get into who "won or lost the debate" as many like to speculate. I doubt there was anything that will seriously move any poll numbers much. However, I would like to raise one topic for discussion that came from the earlier debate that bears examining: the question of "which Democrat do you most admire (or words to that effect)" that none of the candidates would answer. In fact, it was likened to the silly CNBC question about fantasy football. I find nothing silly about it at all, as I think it speaks to a candidate's ability to work across the aisle to get things done and could offer the voter some insight as to whether or not someone is best suited to do just that.  One of the reasons the Clinton presidency has some successes to its credit was Bill's ability to reach across the aisle, moving more to the center after his first two years. I am sure his first mid-terms after taking office taught him something! I don't see that Obama's taught him anything. This is not to say that I think Clinton was a great president-- his obvious failure was sadly a costly one of integrity. But we can learn from anyone. We all set examples-- some good, some bad. In this case, Clinton did set a good example in his willingness to negotiate and compromise to get things done. We must break the current crippling polarization in Washington and get some work done.

I'd love to know your thoughts on this topic. Other topics to come as the election season starts to heat up!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Treason or Patriotism?

Many years ago, the Democrats couldn't wait to get all of the facts surrounding Watergate out in the public eye. The Washington Post has been celebrated as a bastion of the free press recently in a movie (which we have yet to see, but plan to).


Now, the idea of releasing a memo that may indicate wrong-doing on the part of the FBI and DOJ is hailed as treasonous by some who would prefer the secrets remain secrets. I have seen or heard of nothing in the recently released memo that would appear to compromise national security -- have you?

Hate Speech

The amount of vitriol directed at President Trump seems to be unprecedented. At least, that is what those on the right seem to think. Of course, I remember plenty of criticism and hate speech hurled at President Obama during his time in office, as well. I don't think I really need to mention President George W. Bush, do I?

There has never been (in my lifetime) such a level of animosity between opposing viewpoints as I see in today's America. Democrats hurl murderous accusations against the Republicans for their healthcare proposals and those of a conservative view sling accusations of incompetence and hypocrisy back at them. Of course, either side is generally pretty good at documenting their accusations with freshly spun 'facts.'

No matter where you fit into the political spectrum, it is important to note that such contention is counter-productive. Whenever people react at the behest of their emotions, clear-headed and rational decisions are nowhere to be found. Moreo…

Comey Testimony

It's been a while since I have seen the kind of hype that there has been around having Director Comey testify in front of the Senate today. It seems worse than Watergate! There also seems to be no evidence thus far except for of the here-say variety .

No less than 5 times did he call President Trump (or his administration) a liar. Aside from what that does to the office of the President, it takes away from getting things done that so desperately need to get done. Now, please don't misunderstand, if there has been serious wrongdoing on the part of the Trump administration, then they need to be called out on it. We have already recently had 8 years of "anything-but-transparency" in Washington.

Reading the New York Times would lead one to the conclusion that this was a bad day for the Trump administration. I'm not so sure of that. I'm not huge fan of the President, but have to say that I did not hear anything qualifying as evidence to bring about impeachment pro…