Skip to main content

The KJV-Only Controversy

I just got yet another book from Amazon. This time it is from James White and deals with the "King James Only" controversy that seems to plague the evangelical Christian world from time to time. For the reader that may not know what I am talking about (perhaps it is because you are more blessed than those of us who do), a brief explanation is in order.

There is a segment of Christianity that feels strongly about the King James Version of the Bible from 1611 being the only Bible translation that accurately records the Word of God-- and is therefore the sole version He wants us to use. Some will not even concede that there is a suitable version for any other language and all must therefore learn English if they wish to read and understand God's Word. I know of one preacher that goes so far as to say that it even corrects the Greek manuscripts (New Testament) from which it was translated. All of the 'onlyists' consider translations made from the same manuscripts as the KJV to be corruptions and generally suspect some sort of satanic involvement (at the very least the brothers and sisters who worked on them are grievously deceived). So it is not just whether you translate your New Testament from the Textus Receptus that matters-- it's that you bothered to do so in the first place.

As someone who enjoys reading and comparing several different translations, I am looking forward to delving into this book and gaining some insights from James White.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering Why

I was watching Bill O'Reilly this evening as he interviewed Tony Orlando, who has agreed to perform at the Armed Services Ball. Not only is he doing it for the veterans, he is doing it for America -- out of respect for our tradition of a peaceful transfer of power. He made it clear that, had Hillary won and asked him to perform, he would do the same. It is not a partisan thing. It's about America, not an individual. Bravo, Tony. A true patriotic American.

Think, not react...

The 'action-reaction' scenario that has been playing out between progressives and conservatives is a situation that is becoming increasingly counter-productive and harmful. This is obviously not something new; the battle between left and right has been raging for a long time and those flames were also well-fanned by the previous administration and ineffective congress. Sadly, what happens is a loss of focus on issues that we should be working together to solve and increase in counter-productive squabbling. The level of immaturity being witnessed as coming from our 45th president is unfortunate. Less use of Twitter would serve him better, provided he actually took the time to build better relationships with key figures in the media. Some of it has been nothing short of childish and the sort of thing I might have engaged in as a 12 year old, were Twitter in existence then.

President Trump's tendency to engage in knee-jerk reactions is unfortunate. A case in point is his exec…

Just a bit of DISGUST...

I've got to admit I expected more from the do-nothing body we call Congress with its GOP majority at present. Instead, we got more of the same old tired rhetoric we have been getting for the past 7+ years now about how terrible Obamacare is.

The plan they managed to produce after all this time (Paul Ryan's) is not much better than what is in place and apparently leaves a lot of middle-class people financially screwed. I understand it polled with a 17% approval rate. All I know is the many votes over the past few years to repeal it were nothing more than political grandstanding --  a waste of time and taxpayer money. All the Republicans seem to be able to do is criticize and come up with little to offer themselves. They cannot even seem to reach a consensus among themselves (a problem they have had as long as I can remember).

Personally, I have felt for a long time that they should simply fix what is in place so it works better and offers more flexibility with lower costs. I th…