Skip to main content

Interesting Discussion Last Night

We had an interesting discussion of Genesis 2-3 last night during our Bible study. Some believe (the Seventh Day Adventists for one, I think) that man was not originally immortal and depended on the "Tree of Life" to remain alive. There is strong biblical support for that idea and Moody's Bible Commentary seems to agree. Of course, once Adam and Eve ate from the "Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil," they could no longer remain in the garden and have access to the Tree of Life . Their newfound knowledge of good and evil was a threat  and God could not allow them to remain there and possibly eat of the Tree of Life (Gen. 3:22-24). The stage was set for for the need for a Savior (Gen. 3:15).

In thinking about the things said that led up to the fall of mankind, it is important to stop and think about Satan -- how he operated then and how he continues to operate in the very same manner today. He lies. He is a master of lying (John 8:44). He hates people and will do whatever he can to see our ruin. This is evident in his treatment of people throughout scripture. He does his best to deceive. He calls God a liar and appeals to the darker side of people. He told Eve that God lied to them and they would not die if they ate from the tree. He also told her that they would become like God, knowing both good and evil -- he knew such things would be appealing to her (Gen. 3:4-5).

Once they both ate of the fruit, they realized they were naked and covered themselves up. You see, sin entered the world and brought fear and shame with it. Religion was born, as people saw a need to 'cover' themselves before God in some vain attempt to hide the truth about themselves and their actions. God never wanted that; He always desired a relationship with us. It is now possible, but only through Jesus Christ (John 14:6). Thank God He has provided a way for us!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Treason or Patriotism?

Many years ago, the Democrats couldn't wait to get all of the facts surrounding Watergate out in the public eye. The Washington Post has been celebrated as a bastion of the free press recently in a movie (which we have yet to see, but plan to).


Now, the idea of releasing a memo that may indicate wrong-doing on the part of the FBI and DOJ is hailed as treasonous by some who would prefer the secrets remain secrets. I have seen or heard of nothing in the recently released memo that would appear to compromise national security -- have you?

Hate Speech

The amount of vitriol directed at President Trump seems to be unprecedented. At least, that is what those on the right seem to think. Of course, I remember plenty of criticism and hate speech hurled at President Obama during his time in office, as well. I don't think I really need to mention President George W. Bush, do I?

There has never been (in my lifetime) such a level of animosity between opposing viewpoints as I see in today's America. Democrats hurl murderous accusations against the Republicans for their healthcare proposals and those of a conservative view sling accusations of incompetence and hypocrisy back at them. Of course, either side is generally pretty good at documenting their accusations with freshly spun 'facts.'

No matter where you fit into the political spectrum, it is important to note that such contention is counter-productive. Whenever people react at the behest of their emotions, clear-headed and rational decisions are nowhere to be found. Moreo…

Comey Testimony

It's been a while since I have seen the kind of hype that there has been around having Director Comey testify in front of the Senate today. It seems worse than Watergate! There also seems to be no evidence thus far except for of the here-say variety .

No less than 5 times did he call President Trump (or his administration) a liar. Aside from what that does to the office of the President, it takes away from getting things done that so desperately need to get done. Now, please don't misunderstand, if there has been serious wrongdoing on the part of the Trump administration, then they need to be called out on it. We have already recently had 8 years of "anything-but-transparency" in Washington.

Reading the New York Times would lead one to the conclusion that this was a bad day for the Trump administration. I'm not so sure of that. I'm not huge fan of the President, but have to say that I did not hear anything qualifying as evidence to bring about impeachment pro…