Skip to main content

The Two Trees

We recently began a new Bible study and are currently in the book of Genesis. There has been much discussion of the  "tree of knowledge of good and evil" mentioned in Genesis: And out of the ground made the Lord God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil. -Genesis 2:9 This 'tree of knowledge of good and evil' was created by God. Let us look at another type of 'tree,' the cross of our Lord Jesus. This one was created by man: The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree. -Acts 5:30 Also, let's read 1 Peter 2:24: Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed. We know that the first tree was nice to look at and obviously very enticing. We also know that God forbade Adam and Eve from eating its fruit. Because of that, Satan used his usually trickery to get Eve [and then Adam] to partake of it, causing the fall. The second tree, the cross of our Lord, is another matter. God wants us to partake of that tree, giving us eternal life with him because of the sacrifice that Jesus made when He was hung upon. In a reversal of roles, Satan does all he can to keep us from it.

One of the group attendees brought up an interesting idea from an author later identified to as A.W. Pink, who in his book Gleanings in Genesis (part of a series of 'Gleanings' books on different parts of the Bible) discusses how certain things are compared and contrasted; further, he believed the Holy Spirit prompts us to look at these hidden gems. I cannot help but agree. I am glad to have made the acquaintance of this author's writings and am grateful my friend brought it up. The thoughts I have expressed above came from that book and, I think, bared repeating.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Treason or Patriotism?

Many years ago, the Democrats couldn't wait to get all of the facts surrounding Watergate out in the public eye. The Washington Post has been celebrated as a bastion of the free press recently in a movie (which we have yet to see, but plan to).


Now, the idea of releasing a memo that may indicate wrong-doing on the part of the FBI and DOJ is hailed as treasonous by some who would prefer the secrets remain secrets. I have seen or heard of nothing in the recently released memo that would appear to compromise national security -- have you?

Hate Speech

The amount of vitriol directed at President Trump seems to be unprecedented. At least, that is what those on the right seem to think. Of course, I remember plenty of criticism and hate speech hurled at President Obama during his time in office, as well. I don't think I really need to mention President George W. Bush, do I?

There has never been (in my lifetime) such a level of animosity between opposing viewpoints as I see in today's America. Democrats hurl murderous accusations against the Republicans for their healthcare proposals and those of a conservative view sling accusations of incompetence and hypocrisy back at them. Of course, either side is generally pretty good at documenting their accusations with freshly spun 'facts.'

No matter where you fit into the political spectrum, it is important to note that such contention is counter-productive. Whenever people react at the behest of their emotions, clear-headed and rational decisions are nowhere to be found. Moreo…

Comey Testimony

It's been a while since I have seen the kind of hype that there has been around having Director Comey testify in front of the Senate today. It seems worse than Watergate! There also seems to be no evidence thus far except for of the here-say variety .

No less than 5 times did he call President Trump (or his administration) a liar. Aside from what that does to the office of the President, it takes away from getting things done that so desperately need to get done. Now, please don't misunderstand, if there has been serious wrongdoing on the part of the Trump administration, then they need to be called out on it. We have already recently had 8 years of "anything-but-transparency" in Washington.

Reading the New York Times would lead one to the conclusion that this was a bad day for the Trump administration. I'm not so sure of that. I'm not huge fan of the President, but have to say that I did not hear anything qualifying as evidence to bring about impeachment pro…